The main reason for investing in course technology is convenience. It allows you to create and deliver courses at a fraction of the cost of traditional methods. But, there are some drawbacks to using this type of technology. For example, the lack of transparency and support can make you appear as a tech snob.
Lack of support
Many teachers have said that they would like to see course technology implemented across the curriculum. They say that the technology can have a positive impact on reluctant readers, writers, and boys. However, this support is often not available, despite the need for teachers to make it available. This lack of support is a significant barrier for many teachers.
Lack of transparency
Transparency in course technology can be a problematic concept. Many students don’t view transparency as a productive use of class time. They may have become accustomed to instructors who don’t explain how they plan their lessons. They may also not understand the benefits of TILT. To remedy this issue, there are several steps faculty can take to improve transparency in course technology.
One way to make course technology more transparent is to link each activity to its intended objective. By doing this, instructors can avoid the negative reactions that can come with poor transparency. Transparency can also be achieved through the use of clear, easy-to-understand assignments. This approach also promotes a conscious understanding of how students learn.
Transparency in course technology can help students build academic confidence and improve their employability. Transparent assignments also help students create a sense of ownership in their learning. Furthermore, they can be more creative in their assignments, which can help them succeed in their future careers. Transparency in course technology can help faculty improve their instruction and increase student engagement.
The level of transparency refers to the amount of information that is accessible. This measure can be classified according to its relevance, usability, and accessibility. It is subjective and depends on the context and the actors involved.
